Avoiding Liability Bulletin – October 2016

By: Richard S. Leslie, J.D.
Attorney at Law – “At the Intersection of Law and Psychotherapy”

Below you will find topics that I have written about in prior issues of the Avoiding Liability Bulletin. I make brief comments here or ask questions to highlight some things to keep in mind or to research in order to help you minimize the likelihood of incurring liability. Once you spot the issue or recognize the problem, it is usually possible to ascertain, through research or consultation, the applicable laws, regulations, common law, or ethical principles that will govern.

It is critical to know which exceptions to confidentiality, if any, must be disclosed to the client prior to the commencement of treatment. Most state laws or regulations specify required exceptions to confidentiality (e.g., reporting child or elder abuse) and permissive exceptions to confidentiality (e.g., sharing information with other licensed health practitioners or facilities), where a signed authorization from the patient is not required. The full list of mandatory and permissive exceptions to confidentiality may be so long as to render it impractical, unnecessary, or in some cases unwise, to disclose all of them to the client – unless required. The federal HIPAA Privacy Rule specifies disclosures regarding confidentiality that must be made in the Notice of Privacy Practices given to patients of covered entities/providers.

In addition to whatever disclosures may be required by state law, practitioners may choose to disclose some of the more common exceptions to confidentiality – such as the child abuse, elder abuse, and dependent adult abuse reporting duties, laws that allow communications with other health care providers or facilities for diagnosis or treatment purposes, and laws that allow disclosure for purposes of obtaining payment (insurance reimbursement). Some may also choose to disclose the exceptions related to patients who are determined to be dangerous to self or others. The exact nature of the various disclosures will depend upon applicable state laws.


The evidence you will typically deal with during litigation consists of your treatment records and your testimony in court or at a deposition. As for treatment records, they can be subpoenaed in civil or criminal cases. Whether the records can be kept out of evidence, either entirely or partially, will depend upon the assertion of the psychotherapist-patient privilege by or on behalf of the holder of the privilege and the court ruling as to whether the privilege has been waived or is inapplicable. Generally, the privilege is waived by operation of law when patients put into issue in a lawsuit their mental or emotional condition – that is, when they allege that they suffered mental or emotional harm as a result of the actions of the party being sued.

As for your testimony, opposing lawyers will usually look to challenge and impeach your credibility as a witness by, among other things, exploiting differences between your testimony and your records, or by challenging the accuracy of your curriculum vitae. It is therefore important to be accurate in describing your background. I have seen exaggerations or misstatements in advertisements or in resumes negatively affect the very outcome of the case because of the damage done to the therapist’s credibility.


Does the scope of your license, allow you to perform psychological testing and to advertise the fact that such testing is a part of the services that you offer? Must the testing be done with patients that you are treating, or may you perform the testing for patients referred by other practitioners? Does the scope of your license allow you to give nutritional advice or to recommend dietary supplements to existing clients? Does the scope of your license allow you to engage in limited, non-sexual physical contact with your client or is physical contact specifically prohibited? Is hugging a client or other nonsexual touch lawful and appropriate under certain circumstances?


Privilege involves the right to withhold testimony in a legal proceeding. As soon as the practitioner knows that a subpoena for records or for testimony in court or at a deposition is soon to be served, or as soon as it is served, the practitioner should be ready to assert the privilege and communicate with the “holder” of the privilege. Do you know who the holder of the privilege is when you are treating a minor with the consent of a parent? Do you know who the holder of the privilege is when you are treating a couple? Do you know who the holder of the privilege is when the patient is deceased? Does the law in your state provide for joint holders of the privilege? Generally, the holder of the privilege is the patient – but depending upon circumstances and the law in your state of practice, there are some fine points that you must understand in order to avoid making a mistake.

Can you explain the difference between a confidential communication and a privileged communication? Are all confidential communications privileged? Are all privileged communications confidential?


When a therapist determines that the patient presents a serious danger of physical violence to another, the therapist may be under a duty, statutory or otherwise, to take steps to protect the intended victim. This is not necessarily the case in every state, since some states may not impose an affirmative duty to warn or protect third parties. In states where there is a duty, the practitioner must know when the duty arises, what the precise duty is, and whether a particular course of action may result in immunity from liability for the practitioner who acts in a specified manner. In California, many practitioners have long thought (mistakenly) that the famed “Tarasoff” decision of the California Supreme Court created a duty to warn. Actually, the Court originally did create such a duty – but shortly thereafter, they corrected themselves!

If it is proven that the practitioner acted as a reasonably prudent practitioner would have acted under the same or substantially similar circumstances, can liability ultimately be avoided even though the client, after leaving a session, commits an act of violence against a supervisor at work? Is there a “duty to predict” dangerousness in the state in which you practice? Must the patient actually communicate to the therapist a threat of physical violence against another before any duty to protect arises?

Does the law in your state require that you disclose to the patient, prior to the commencement of treatment, the child abuse reporting requirement imposed upon you? Many therapists do disclose their reporting duty even though disclosure may not be required by law. Some legislators have felt that disclosure of the reporting duty might inhibit patients from sharing information about the abuse, while others argue that knowledge of the reporting duty might help those who have been abused, and even those who have abused, to eventually share their experiences with their therapists – to reach out for help, knowing that it will be reported.

Is a court-ordered emancipated minor still considered to be a “child” for purposes of the child abuse reporting law in your state? Is it true in your state that generally there is no need to report child abuse when an adult patient tells you of experiencing physical abuse that occurred when the patient was a child?


Your client tells you of an incident involving the financial fraud suffered by her 70 year old father residing in another state. Is an elder abuse report required? Does the abused elder need to be located in your state of practice in order for a report to be required? Do you believe that you are bound by the reporting laws of other states or only the reporting laws of the state in which you practice? Are you aware of the definition of financial abuse in the elder abuse reporting law? What if the abuse is committed by an entity (e.g., an insurance company or bank) rather than a caretaker or other individual? Mandated reporters may fail to recognize the existence of reportable financial abuse of an elder because its definition is sometimes broader than they imagined and because the elder may not be mentally or physically impaired and may be competent in all respects.


Click to Get an Instant Quote Online Today!

Click to Get an Instant Quote Online Today!


Richard Leslie

"At the Intersection of Law and Psychotherapy" Richard S. Leslie is an attorney who has practiced at the intersection of law and psychotherapy for the past twenty-five years. Most recently, he was a consultant to the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT), where he worked with their various state divisions to develop and implement their legislative agendas. He also provided telephone consultation services to AAMFT members regarding legal and ethical issues confronting practitioners of diverse licensure nationwide. Additionally, he wrote articles regarding legal and ethical issues for their Family Therapy Magazine and presented at workshops on a variety of legal issues. Prior to his work with AAMFT, Richard was Legal Counsel to the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists (CAMFT) for approximately twenty-two years. He was director of Government Relations for CAMFT, and as such was the architect of CAMFT’s widely regarded and successful legislative agenda. He represented CAMFT before the regulatory board (the Board of Behavioral Sciences) and was a tireless advocate for due process and fairness for licensees and applicants. He was a regular presenter at workshops and was consistently evaluated as CAMFT’s most highly rated presenter. He also sat with the CAMFT Ethics Committee and acted as their advisor on matters pertaining to the enforcement of ethical standards. Richard is an acknowledged expert on matters pertaining to the interrelationship between law and the practice of marriage and family therapy and psychotherapy. For many years, he taught Law and Ethics courses for a number of colleges and universities in their marriage and family therapy degree programs. While at CAMFT, he provided telephone consultation services with thousands of therapists in California and elsewhere for over twenty years. He is highly regarded for his judgment, his expertise, his direct style, and his clarity. Richard has been the driving force for many of the changes and additions to the laws of the State of California that affect MFTs. In 1980, he was primarily responsible for achieving passage of the "Freedom of Choice Law" that required insurance companies to pay for psychotherapy services performed by MFTs. Passage of that law allowed MFTs to earn a living, allowed them to better compete in the marketplace, and strengthened the profession in California by leading to a great increase in the number of licensees and CAMFT membership. Currently, about half of the licensed marriage and family therapists in the country are licensed in California. While at CAMFT, Richard was primarily responsible for, among other things, the successful effort to criminalize sex between a patient and a therapist. He was successful in extending the laws of psychotherapist-patient privilege to MFTs, thereby giving patients the same level of privacy protection as when seeing a psychiatrist or psychologist. He fought tirelessly and successfully for the right of MFTs to refer to themselves as "psychotherapists," to perform psychological testing services, to be appropriately reimbursed by California’s Victims of Crime Program, and to be employed in county mental health agencies throughout California. Richard was admitted to the Bar in New York (1969) and in California (1973). While practicing in New York, he served as a public defender, and later, as an Assistant District Attorney. Shortly after moving to California, he worked for the San Diego County Human Relations Commission as their Law and Justice Officer. While there, he worked successfully to achieve greater racial diversity in the criminal jury selection system and to expose and stop police abuse. For such work with that agency, he was the recipient of the Civil Libertarian of the Year Award by the San Diego Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Have Questions? click here, We’re happy to help!